On 10/30/25 07:51, Peter Krempa via Devel wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:47:11 -0400, Aaron Brown wrote:
On 10/24/25 13:49, Peter Krempa wrote:
The patches look good to me as they addressed all my comments from
previous version (and sorry for missing this, and the ping).
Any reason why this is still labelled as RFC? Can it be merged?
On 10/24/25 8:29 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Hi Peter,
I would appreciate you merging it.
The RFC seems to be an oversight.
Hi all, I labelled these patches as RFC in case there were any additional
changes requested. If not, it is ready to merge.
Please note for future patches, the RFC label is used for patches where
you are unsure about your design (and e.g. didn't fully implement
everything) or have a dependancy that's still blocking them.
In general anything that is not really supposed to be merged in the
proposed form.
This series might have fallen through the cracks.
It can be merged unless Aaron is supposed to resend it without RFC.
Please let Aaron know what to do. Thanks.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards
Boris Fiuczynski
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
