Le 18/09/11 23:06, Michael Walle a écrit : > Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 22:34:08 schrieb Yann Sionneau: >> Do we really need to keep the "4.11" inside the toolchain name ? Is it >> really a good idea ? What will we do when RTEMS-4.12 will be released ? >> >> Why not using only lm32-rtems-gcc like other systems ? > the idea is to use rtems prebuilt toolchains and rtems uses the additional > version to support multiple rtems revisions. So if you want to stick with the > official rtems toolchains, you'll always have the version inside the cross > compiler prefix. OK, got it, so I need to make MacPorts people understand that we need to keep this version number in the toolchain. So either fix the "crossgcc" PortGroup, or do not use it for the lm32-rtems4.11-gcc Portfile. > >> I am just asking for your opinion on this. > all scripts should use a CROSS_COMPILE prefix which may default to lm32- > rtems4.11- but you should be able to override it via an environment variable, > eg. only set CROSS_COMPILE if its unset. (or CROSS; but linux kernel, uclibc > and busybox uses CROSS_COMPILE, iirc). > > Yes that would be nice to modify the scripts to use CROSS_COMPILE if defined, and otherwise overwrite it with default if not defined.
Thanks for your feed back ! Regards, -- Yann Sionneau _______________________________________________ http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org IRC: #milkymist@Freenode
