Whoops. that was *supposed* to be off list. :-)
I meant to take this off list to discuss with Ralph further and come
up with the final answer because I didn't want to clutter up everyone
INBOXes any further...
On Jan 5, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 8:16 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I actually don't quite understand -- in this case, we *did* just
take
a big drop from ORTE. If the problem truly is in the MPI side of
the
house, then the "big drop" philosophy doesn't help here.
No, we took a patch - one among many. That means I can't be certain
that the
RTE is fully consistent. While we did our best, that doesn't mean
it's
consistent.
Off list.
Now wait a minute -- I'm now very confused. You told me on the phone
the other day that for #700, you made a patch that made the RTE be
the same between the trunk and v1.2. Granted, a few things happened
on the trunk *after* you made that patch, and a few non-ORTE patches
were applied to 1.2 before yours was applied. But I'm going on what
I understood you said in that we effectively *did* take a drop
because your patch make ORTE in 1.2 become exactly like the ORTE in
the trunk...
--
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
