On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 04:52:45PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
> >1. btl_*_min_send_size is used to decide when to stop striping a
> >message across multiple BTL's. Is there a reason that we don't
> >just use eager_limit for this value? It seems weird to say "this
> >message is short enough to go across 1 BTL, even though it'll take
> >multiple sends if min_send_size > eager_limit". If no one has any
> >objections, we suggest eliminating this MCA parameter (!!) and
> >corresponding value and just using the BTL's eager limit for this
> >value (this value is set by every BTL, but only used in exactly 1
> >place in OB1).
> >
> >Len: please put this on the agenda for next Tuesday (just so that
> >there's a deadline to ensure progress).
>
> No one has commented on this, so I assume we'll discuss on Tuesday. :-)
>
I've just realised we forgot to talk about this :(
--
Gleb.
