Much higher (23), but in way over-subscribed mode ...
On 11/2/07 8:07 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > Did you run with a higher number of procs? > > -jms > Sent from my PDA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgra...@ornl.gov] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: Open MPI Developers > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken > > It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs > using sm and self, ob1 and dr. > > Rich > > > On 11/2/07 3:57 PM, "Don Kerr" <don.k...@sun.com> wrote: > >> > Rich, >> > >> > Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl >> > seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but I have not >> > looked into it yet. >> > >> > -DON >> > >> > Richard Graham wrote: >> > >>> >> R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using >>> >> ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing >>> >> a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not >>> >> update this function >>> >> (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to >>> >> ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize >>> >> the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to >>> >> be only the openib btl. >>> >> >>> >> Rich >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgra...@ornl.gov> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the >>> >> openib >>> >> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only >>> >> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL >>> >> that >>> >> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable >>> >> machines. :-) >>> >> >>> >> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he >>> >> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is >>> >> not using >>> >> the new freelist init functions. >>> >> >>> >> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init >>> >> functions that need to? >>> >> >>>>> >>>> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just >>> >> one. The IB btl uses the >>>>> >>>> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did >>> >> change. >>> >> >>>>> >>>> rich >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Jeff Squyres >>> >> Cisco Systems >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> devel mailing list >>> >> de...@open-mpi.org >>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> devel mailing list >>> >> de...@open-mpi.org >>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> devel mailing list >>> >> de...@open-mpi.org >>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devel mailing list >> > de...@open-mpi.org >> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
