Yes, I think we should change paffinity.h and paffinity_solaris_module.c and paffinity_windows_module.c .
I added those API's some time ago based on the plpa API's. Now, the plpa API has changed and no one uses those API's. (Except me and in the future, maybe Sun guys) So I don't see why not change those API's including their signature in paffinity.h Sharon. -----Original Message----- From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:19 PM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready? On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> Right, but the plpa_solaris_module.c file will need to be updated >> with > the new function signatures so that it will still compile (i.e., if > you're going to be changing the function signatures in paffinity.h). Hah -- I meant paffinity_solaris_module.c. :-) -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
