On Wednesday 02 April 2008 05:04:47 pm Ralph Castain wrote:
> Here's a real simple diagnostic you can do: set -mca plm_base_verbose 1 and
> look at the cmd line being executed (send it here). It will look like:
>
> [[xxx,1],0] plm:rsh: executing: jjkljks;jldfsaj;
>
> If the cmd line has --daemonize on it, then the ssh will close and xterm
> won't work.

[vic20:01863] [[40388,0],0] plm:rsh: executing: (//usr/bin/ssh) [/usr/bin/ssh 
vic12 orted --daemonize -mca ess env -mca orte_ess_jobid 2646867968 -mca 
orte_ess_vpid 1 -mca orte_ess_num_procs 
2 --hnp-uri 
"2646867968.0;tcp://192.168.70.150:39057;tcp://10.10.0.150:39057;tcp://86.75.30.10:39057"
 --nodename 
vic12 -mca btl openib,self --mca btl_openib_receive_queues 
P,65536,256,128,128 -mca plm_base_verbose 1 -mca 
mca_base_param_file_path 
/usr/mpi/gcc/ompi-trunk/share/openmpi/amca-param-sets:/root -mca 
mca_base_param_file_path_force /root]


It looks like what you say is happening.  Is this configured somewhere, so 
that I can remove it?

Thanks,
Jon

> Ralph
>
> On 4/2/08 3:14 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Can you diagnose a little further:
> >
> > 1. in the case where it works, can you verify that the ssh to launch
> > the orteds is still running?
> >
> > 2. in the case where it doesn't work, can you verify that the ssh to
> > launch the orteds has actually died?
> >
> > On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 02 April 2008 01:21:31 pm Jon Mason wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 02 April 2008 11:54:50 am Ralph H Castain wrote:
> >>>> I remember that someone had found a bug that caused
> >>>> orte_debug_flag to not
> >>>> get properly set (local var covering over a global one) - could be
> >>>> that
> >>>> your tmp-public branch doesn't have that patch in it.
> >>>>
> >>>> You might try updating to the latest trunk
> >>>
> >>> I updated my ompi-trunk tree, did a clean build, and I still seem
> >>> the same
> >>> problem.  I regressed trunk to rev 17589 and everything works as I
> >>> expect.
> >>> So I think the problem is still there in the top of trunk.
> >>
> >> I stepped through the revs of trunk and found the first failing rev
> >> to be
> >> 17632.  Its a big patch, so I'll defer to those more in the know to
> >> determine
> >> what is breaking in there.
> >>
> >>> I don't discount user error, but I don't think I am doing anyting
> >>> different.
> >>> Did some setting change that perhaps I did not modify?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>>> On 4/2/08 10:41 AM, "George Bosilca" <bosi...@eecs.utk.edu> wrote:
> >>>>> I'm using this feature on the trunk with the version from
> >>>>> yesterday.
> >>>>> It works without problems ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   george.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wednesday 02 April 2008 11:07:18 am Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >>>>>>> Are these r numbers relevant on the /tmp-public branch, or the
> >>>>>>> trunk?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I pulled it out of the command used to update the branch, which
> >>>>>> was:
> >>>>>> svn merge -r 17590:17917 https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/trunk .
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the cpc tmp branch, it happened at r17920.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Jon
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> >>>>>>>> I regressed my tree and it looks like it happened between
> >>>>>>>> 17590:17917
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wednesday 02 April 2008 10:22:52 am Jon Mason wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I am noticing that ssh seems to be broken on trunk (and my cpc
> >>>>>>>>> branch, as
> >>>>>>>>> it is based on trunk).  When I try to use xterm and gdb to
> >>>>>>>>> debug, I
> >>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>> successfully get 1 xterm.  I have tried this on 2 different
> >>>>>>>>> setups.  I can
> >>>>>>>>> successfully get the xterm's on the 1.2 svn branch.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am running the following command:
> >>>>>>>>> mpirun --n 2 --host vic12,vic20 -mca btl tcp,self -d xterm -e
> >>>>>>>>> gdb /usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-1.2-svn/tests/IMB-3.0/IMB-MPI1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Is anyone else seeing this problem?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Jon
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> devel mailing list
> >>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> devel mailing list
> >>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to