Yes, it may well be...
It needs to handle the case where paffinity can return "Sorry, I don't
have this information for you."
On Jul 23, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
can this also be a reason for seqv on NUMA nodes(#1382) , that I
cant recreate ?
On 7/23/08, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: On Jul 23,
2008, at 10:37 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
This seems to work for me too. What is interesting is my
experiments have shown that if you run on RH5.1 you don't need to
set mpi_yield_when_idle to 0.
Yes, this makes sense -- on RHEL5.1, it's a much newer Linux kernel
and PLPA works as expected there. So ODLS uses the values that PLPA
passes back and all is good.
On older Linux kernels, we're effectively returning "not supported"
from paffinity, and therefore ODLS (rightly) assumes that it can't
know anything and puts us into the "oversubscribed" state.
I'm working on a fix.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
