On Jul 28, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

I think Lenny is pointing out that "smaller" got changed to "bigger", too. :-)

Looking at the test in the code (btl_openib_component.c):

           if ((rd_num - rd_low) > rd_win) {
orte_show_help("help-mpi-btl-openib.txt", "non optimal rd_win",
                       true, rd_win, rd_num - rd_low);
           }

So the change in the help message is correct -- it is better when rd_win is bigger than (rd_num - rd_low).

Ralph -- were you running with a non-default btl_openib_receive_queues?



Yep...was using a queue layout from Brad that is pretty complex. I was just pointing out that the warning's stated condition was met, so either the warning text is wrong or the test that generates it is wrong.




On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote:

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:14:29PM +0300, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:

-advisable to configure rd_win smaller then (rd_num - rd_low), but currently +advisable to configure rd_win bigger then (rd_num - rd_low), but currently
                                        ^ a


--
Cluster and Metacomputing Working Group
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany

private: http://adi.thur.de
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to