I just re-tested to confirm, and that is correct.
-mca btl openib works
-mca btl openib,self hangs
-mca btl openib,sm works
On Jul 28, 2008, at 9:49 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
I'm a little bit lost here. You're stating that openib,self doesn't
work while openib does? In other words that adding self to the BTL
leads to deadlocks?
george.
PS: Btw, it is not supposed to work at all, except in the case where
openib handle internal messages (where the source and destination is
the same process).
On Jul 28, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
On Jul 28, 2008, at 8:52 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
only openib works for me too,
but Glebs said to me once that it's illigal and I always need to
use self btl.
Don't know - could be true. But if that is true, then we should
check to see if that condition is met and error out - with an
appropriate message - if so. Otherwise, how is a user supposed to
know this condition?
On 7/28/08, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: FWIW, all my
MTT runs are hanging as well.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Brad Benton wrote:
My experience is the same a Lenny's. I've tested on x86_64 and
ppc64 systems and tests using --mca btl openib,self hang in all
cases.
--brad
2008/7/28 Lenny Verkhovsky <lenny.verkhov...@gmail.com>
I failed to run on different nodes or on the same node via
self,openib
On 7/28/08, Ralph Castain <r...@lanl.gov> wrote:
I checked this out some more and I believe it is ticket #1378
related. We lock up if SM is included in the BTL's, which is what
I had done on my test. If I ^sm, I can run fine.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 6:41 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
It could also be something new. Brad and I noted on Fri that IB
was locking up as soon as we tried any cross-node communications.
Hadn't seen that before, and at least I haven't explored it
further - planned to do so today.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
I believe it it.
On 7/28/08, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: On Jul 28,
2008, at 7:51 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Is this related to r1378?
Gah -- I meant #1378, meaning the "PML ob1 deadlock" ticket.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
Hi,
I experience hanging of tests ( latency ) since r19010
Best Regards
Lenny.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
