A little google searching, and the best I can find is that
memset is part of the C89/C90 standard, while bzero isn't.
Thus memset would/should be supported even on non-POSIX
systems.  Also, the opengroup claims that the bzero is LEGACY
and "This function may be withdrawn in a future version."
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/bzero.html

However, who actually thinks that bzero would ever be removed?

And yes, there is a hyphen in ;-)    Now back to productive work for me.

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Tim Mattox <timat...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> Actually, bzero() is POSIX.  Here is the history section of the bzero man page
> on Mac OS X 10.4:
>
> A bzero() function appeared in 4.3BSD.  Its prototype existed previously
>     in <string.h> before it was moved to <strings.h> for IEEE Std 1003.1-2001
>     (``POSIX.1'') compliance.
>
> Hmmm, but the Linux man page says it is deprecated, and says we should
> use memset.
> Wish it explained why...  so I think we are safe to just use bzero,
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> IIRC, bzero is a gnu-ism.  We should probably use memset instead.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2008, at 5:40 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>
>>> Terry,
>>>
>>> We use the feature defined by POSIX mmap where the area should be
>>> zero-filled when the file length is extended. What OS you're using when you
>>> see such problems ?
>>>
>>> Just in case, here is a patch that set the beginning of the mmaped region
>>> to zero, in case this is not done automatically. As in most cases this is an
>>> unnecessary overhead, we should find the cases where we really need this,
>>> and possibly conditionally compile it.
>>>
>>> Index: ompi/mca/common/sm/common_sm_mmap.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- ompi/mca/common/sm/common_sm_mmap.c (revision 19377)
>>> +++ ompi/mca/common/sm/common_sm_mmap.c (working copy)
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@
>>>
>>>                /* initialize the segment - only the first process
>>>                   to open the file */
>>> +                bzero( map->data_addr, size );
>>>                mem_offset = map->data_addr - (unsigned char
>>> *)map->map_seg;
>>>                map->map_seg->seg_offset = mem_offset;
>>>                map->map_seg->seg_size = size - mem_offset;
>>>
>>>  george.
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been seeing an intermittent (once every 4 hours looping on a quick
>>>> initialization program) segv with the following stack trace.
>>>>
>>>> =>[1] mca_btl_sm_add_procs(btl = 0xfffffd7ffdb67ef0, nprocs = 2U, procs =
>>>> 0x591560, peers = 0x591580, reachability = 0xfffffd7fffdff000), line 519 in
>>>> "btl_sm.c"
>>>> [2] mca_bml_r2_add_procs(nprocs = 2U, procs = 0x591560, bml_endpoints =
>>>> 0x591500, reachable = 0xfffffd7fffdff000), line 222 in "bml_r2.c"
>>>> [3] mca_pml_ob1_add_procs(procs = 0x5914c0, nprocs = 2U), line 248 in
>>>> "pml_ob1.c"
>>>> [4] ompi_mpi_init(argc = 1, argv = 0xfffffd7fffdff318, requested = 0,
>>>> provided = 0xfffffd7fffdff234), line 651 in "ompi_mpi_init.c"
>>>> [5] PMPI_Init(argc = 0xfffffd7fffdff2ec, argv = 0xfffffd7fffdff2e0), line
>>>> 90 in "pinit.c"
>>>> [6] main(argc = 1, argv = 0xfffffd7fffdff318), line 82 in "buffer.c"
>>>>
>>>> I believe the problem is that mca_btl_sm_component.shm_fifo[j] contains
>>>> uninitialized data causes the loop on line 504 in btl_sm.c to think that a
>>>> remote rank has set its fifo address.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone else seen the above happening?
>>>>
>>>> --td
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tim Mattox, Ph.D. - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
>  tmat...@gmail.com || timat...@open-mpi.org
>  I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/
>



-- 
Tim Mattox, Ph.D. - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
 tmat...@gmail.com || timat...@open-mpi.org
 I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/

Reply via email to