No specific test, just an idea how this might impact an app.  I am guessing it 
won't even be noticable.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org <devel-boun...@open-mpi.org>
To: Open MPI Developers <de...@open-mpi.org>
Sent: Thu Dec 18 07:13:08 2008
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: make predefined handles extern to pointers

Richard Graham wrote:
> Terry,
>   Is there any way you can quantify the cost ?  This seems reasonable, but
> would be nice to get an idea what the performance cost is (and not within a
> tight loop where everything stays in cache).
>
> Rich
>
>
>   
Ok, I guess that would eliminate any of the simple perf tests like IMB, 
netperf, and such.  So do you have something else in mind, maybe HPCC? 

--td
> On 12/16/08 10:41 AM, "Terry D. Dontje" <terry.don...@sun.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> WHAT:  To make predefined handles extern to pointers instead of an
>> address of an extern to a structure.
>>
>> WHY:  To make OMPI more backwards compatible in regards to changes to
>> structures that define predefined handles.
>>
>> WHERE:  In the trunk.  ompi/include/mpi.h.in and places in ompi that
>> directly use the predefined handles.
>>
>> WHEN:  01/24/2009
>>
>> TIMEOUT:  01/10/2009
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>>
>> The point of this change is to improve the odds that an MPI application
>> does not have to recompile when changes are made to the OMPI library.
>> In this case specifically the predefined handles that use the structures
>> for communicators, groups, ops, datatypes, error handlers, win, file,
>> and info.
>>
>> An example of the changes for the communicator predefined handles can be
>> found in the hg tmp workspace at
>> ssh://www.open-mpi.org/~tdd/hg/predefcompat.
>>
>> Note, the one downfall that Jeff and I could think of by doing this is
>> you potentially add one level of indirection but I believe that will be
>> a small overhead and if you use one of the predefined handles
>> repetitively (like in a loop) that the address will probably be stored
>> in a register once and no additional over should be seen due to this change.
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>   

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to