Should the first fragment of a message be an eager fragment even when the message is long and a rendezvous protocol is employed? So far as I can tell, a long MPI_Send starts like this: MPI_Send() mca_pml_ob1_send() mca_pml_ob1_send_request_start() mca_pml_ob1_send_request_start_btl() http://svn.open-mpi.org/source/xref/ompi_1.3/ompi/mca/pml/ob1/pml_ob1_sendreq.h?r=20298#340 Here we see (e.g., line 368) that if we're over the eager limit, we try to send the first fragment with "eager" size. Then, mca_pml_ob1_send_request_start_rndv() mca_bml_base_prepare_src() mca_btl_sm_prepare_src() But if we look at http://svn.open-mpi.org/source/xref/ompi_1.3/ompi/mca/btl/sm/btl_sm.c#mca_btl_sm_prepare_src it appears to alloc a "MAX" (not EAGER) fragment. Is this a "bug"? Should the BTL be allocating an EAGER fragment instead? Or, could this function possibly be called with size>eager? Or, should the BTL alloc a MAX *or* EAGER fragment depending on what size is requested? |
- [OMPI devel] sm BTL question: frag alloc Eugene Loh
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL question: frag alloc George Bosilca