On Apr 30, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Do we really want to go with a release candidate instead of an
official release? That sounds pretty risky to me...
Probably so. Is a new ROMIO worth a 1.3.4 or pushing 1.3.3 for a
while? (I don't know the release schedule -- I suspect it's fluid,
like ours...). I'm a little hesitant to put in a new ROMIO in 1.4.0...
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
wrote:
How long do we want to wait for 1.3.3? It looks like they're have a
new RC for ROMIO on May 15th -- can we wait that long? At a
minimum, it'll take a day or three to integrate the new ROMIO into
OMPI.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rob Latham <r...@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: April 30, 2009 12:00:22 PM EDT
To: Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
Cc: romio-ma...@mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [ROMIO Req #947] New version of ROMIO?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:18:11PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I can wait a week or so -- it sounds like I should? It is definitely
much easier for us to say "we have the ROMIO from MPICH2 x.y.z" than
to
say "we have ROMIO from MPICH2's SVN rXYZ" -- the first is
significantly
easier for users the understand and compare behavior to.
Pavan says we'll have a release-candidate on may 15th. Perhaps that
will be the best one to use, if you can wait that long.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
