Any of those options are fine with me. I was thinking that if you wanted to talk sooner, we might be able to help explain our intentions with this framework a bit better. I figure that the framework interface will change a bit as we all advance and incorporate our various techniques into it. I think that the current interface is a good first step, but there are certainly many more steps to come.
I am fine delaying this code a bit, just not too long. Meeting at the forum for a while might be a good option (we could probably even arrange to call in others if you wanted). Cheers, Josh On Feb 25, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > If Josh is going to be at the forum, perhaps you folks could chat there? > Might as well take advantage of being colocated, if possible. > > Otherwise, I'm available pretty much any time. I can't contribute much about > the MPI recovery issues, but can contribute to the RTE issues if that helps. > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@eecs.utk.edu> wrote: > Josh, > > Next week is a little bit too early as will need some time to figure out how > to integrate with this new framework, and at what extent our code and > requirements fit into. Then the week after is the MPI Forum. How about on > Thursday 11 March? > > Thanks, > george. > > On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:46 , Josh Hursey wrote: > > > Per my previous suggestion, would it be useful to chat on the phone early > > next week about our various strategies? > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
