On May 3, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > I believe the intent of the (test...) was to see if a .profile existed and > execute that if so. This was at the request of users who complained that > their remote environment wasn't being setup as expected when we launched > their jobs. Might be a better way to do it, though...
Agreed -- am open to a better solution if someone can think of one... -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
