On May 18, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > I agree that /dev/shm introduces extra complications and should not be > the default. The FAQ text I provided was intended to suggest /dev/shm > as a session dir (or session root) ONLY for people who had diskless > nodes and thus no obvious alternatives to network-mounted /tmp. > > If one wants to pursue placing the SM BTL's shared memory files in > /dev/shm by default, that is independent of adding something to the new > FAQ entry to address the diskless case.
Excellent; thanks for the clarification! -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
