On Jun 2, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > This RFC also got discussed on the weekly call (and in several other > discussions). Again, no one seemed to hate it. That being said, hwloc still > needs a bit more soak time; I just committed the 32 bit fix the other day.
We've had what appears to be appropriate hwloc soak time. It seems to be doing ok. Last chance to speak up before I remove all other paffinity components from the SVN trunk, leaving just "hwloc" and "test". Please speak up before COB tomorrow (we've brought this up many times before, so I think the short deadline is ok). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
