As per the RFC below, I'll begin rolling these changes into the trunk over the 
next week.


> WHAT: Begin the process of introducing threads and thread safety into ORTE
> 
> WHY: ORTE is becoming increasingly dependent on thread-safe operations
>           (lock, cond_wait, unlock). However, OPAL thread support is defined 
> to no-ops
>           unless --enable-opal-multi-threads is set. We need an independent 
> way
>           of ensuring thread-safety in ORTE is active as doing so at the OPAL 
> level
>           negatively impacts the MPI layer.
> 
> WHERE: Solely inside the ORTE code tree.
> 
> WHEN: No real rush - somewhere in the 1.5 series
> 
> TIMEOUT: Aug 13
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steps to be completed for Stage 1:
> 
> 1. copy the opal thread code into a new orte/threads directory, renaming and 
> editing as required
> 
> 2. create ORTE_THREAD_[UN]LOCK macros that are always defined and active. 
> Since ORTE isn't a performance-critical code path, we will always lock/unlock 
> as required to protect global data (should help resolve some of our lingering 
> thread-related problems). We will do a global search/replace for the OPAL 
> macros inside the ORTE code tree and replace them with the new ORTE 
> equivalents.
> 
> 3. repackage the orte_job_data, orte_node_pool, orte_nidmap, and orte_jobmap 
> global arrays into a new wrapper class that includes ORTE thread-locking 
> support plus a pointer array. This will allow ORTE to thread-safe these 
> values independent of whether or not OPAL threads are enabled.
> 
> 4. add thread-lock/release code around areas where the globals in #3 are used.
> 
> 

Reply via email to