On Oct 8, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > I have no problem with that, but remember that it will create an ABI break > for any third-party plugin developer. > > As long as we are comfortable doing that, or create the > backward-compatibility we discussed, then this plan is fine by me.
Yes, we will definitely have to make sure we don't break backwards compatibility: - MPI API - the symbol / filename changes we did for MCA I don't think anything else matters, right? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
