Btw it strikes me that we could put the old libevent back as a separate component for comparisons.
Sent from my PDA. No type good. On Oct 26, 2010, at 6:20 AM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:29 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > >> 1. Not all processes deadlock in btl_sm_add_procs. The process that setup >> the shared memory area, is going forward, and block later in a barrier. > > Yes, I'm seeing the same thing (I didn't include all details like this in my > post, sorry). I was running with -np 2 on a local machine and saw vpid=0 get > stuck in opal_progress (because the first time through, seg_inited < > n_local_procs). vpid=1 increments seg_inited and therefore doesn't enter the > loop that calls opal_progress(), and therefore continues on. > >> 2. All other processes, loop around the opal_progress, until they got a >> message from all other processes. The variable used for counting is somehow >> updated correctly, but we still call opal_progress. I couldn't figure out is >> we loop more that we should, or if opal_progress doesn't return. However, >> both of these possibilities look very unlikely to me: the loop in the >> sm_add_procs is pretty straightforward, and I couldn't find any loops in >> opal_progress. I wonder if some of the messages get lost on the exchange. > > I had this problem, too, until I tried to use padb to get stack traces. I > noticed that when I ran padb, my blocked process un-blocked itself and > continued. After more digging, I determined that my blocked process was, in > fact, blocked in poll() with an infinite timeout. padb (or any signal at > all) caused it to unblock and therefore continue. > >> 3. If I unblock the situation by hand, everything goes back to normal. >> NetPIPE runs to completion but the performances are __really__ bad. On my >> test machine I get around 2000Mbs, when the expected value is at least 10 >> times more. Similar finding on the latency side, we're now at 1.65 micro-sec >> up from the usual 0.35 we had before. > > It's a feature! > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel