same type of warnings with gcc-4.3.3

  george.

On Jan 20, 2011, at 15:21 , George Bosilca wrote:

> Even before getting into the Oracle compiler, a fully compliant C99 compiler 
> such as gcc 4.2.1 complains a lot about the new code. Here is what I get:
> 
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:25: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:28: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:29: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:30: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:31: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:33: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:34: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:35: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:37: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:39: warning: 
> ISO C90 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c: In function 
> 'component_open':
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy_component.c:45: warning: 
> unused variable 'c'
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy.c:67: warning: ISO C90 
> forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy.c:68: warning: ISO C90 
> forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy.c:69: warning: ISO C90 
> forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> ../../../../../ompi/orte/mca/debugger/dummy/dummy.c:70: warning: ISO C90 
> forbids specifying subobject to initialize
> 
> 
> 
>  george.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 20:36 , Terry Dontje wrote:
> 
>> Hopefully we'll find out tomorrow but I think I vaguely remember an issue 
>> with the Studio compilers and this type of initialization style.
>> 
>> --td
>> 
>> On 01/19/2011 05:22 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>> Done. I added the module orte/mca/debugger/dummy and I will remove it 
>>> tomorrow. 
>>> 
>>> -Nathan 
>>> HPC-3, LANL 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Jeff Squyres wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> +1 on Ralph and George's comments. 
>>>> 
>>>> Want to make a dummy component somewhere that uses this kind of 
>>>> initialization and see what happens?  Put a test for the C99 
>>>> initialization style in configure.m4 to see if it works or not;         
>>>> MTT will then check this for all the compilers that we care about. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>>> I believe the majority of structs used in OMPI are actually declared to 
>>>>> be opal objects of some           flavor, so I'm not sure how much this 
>>>>> will actually accomplish. Other than that, I have no real objection - 
>>>>> either way works fine for me. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:29 PM, George Bosilca wrote: 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm with you on that. Let's create a fake module using the ISO C99 
>>>>>> naming scheme, and leave it to MTT to figure out where is breaks! 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> george. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 19, 2011, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't know if this has been discussed before or if this will break 
>>>>>>> Windows (or some obscure platform) support but I would like to start 
>>>>>>> using the ISO C99 style for struct initialization (see section 6.7.8, 
>>>>>>> example 10 in 
>>>>>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf). Using this 
>>>>>>> style would make mca code much easier to read. Any thoughts? Would this 
>>>>>>> break something? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Example: 
>>>>>>> struct module_foo { 
>>>>>>>    char *bar; 
>>>>>>>    int   baz; 
>>>>>>> }; 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> struct foo foobar = { 
>>>>>>>    .bar = "foobar", 
>>>>>>>    .baz = 1 
>>>>>>> }; 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Nathan 
>>>>>>> HPC-3, LANL 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>>>>> devel mailing list 
>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org 
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>>>> devel mailing list 
>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org 
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>>> devel mailing list 
>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org 
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jeff Squyres 
>>>> jsquy...@cisco.com 
>>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> devel mailing list 
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org 
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> devel mailing list 
>>> de...@open-mpi.org 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> <Mail Attachment.gif>
>> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
>> Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631
>> Oracle - Performance Technologies
>> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
>> Email terry.don...@oracle.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to