If OFED includes that constant, wouldn't we want to use it? PCI ordering is PCI ordering (i.e., unreliable) on all hardware -- or am I wrong?
On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Don Kerr wrote: > I considered that but I wanted to guard against future OFED inclusion. > Removing the Solaris check is easy enough. > > > On 02/16/11 08:49, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Don Kerr wrote: >>> Yes this is Solaris only. OFED has not bought back the IBV_ACCESS_SO flag. >>> Not sure they ever will. >> It should be sufficient to AC_CHECK_DECLS then -- no need for the additional >> Solaris check. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
