Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it to the no-auth way for a reason.
Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:24 AM To: Open Developers <de...@open-mpi.org> Subject: [OMPI devel] Minor OMPI SVN configuration change We have made a minor change in OMPI's SVN configuration: If you access the SVN repo over https, you *must* authenticate. Previously, you could authenticate or not; SVN would serve up what was appropriate in either case (there's one "private" tree in the SVN repo for not-yet-published academic work). Anonymous, read-only access to SVN is still provided over http. I doubt that this change will affect most people, because most people check out via https only if they plan to commit -- meaning that they have a write-enabled SVN account. Let me know if you have any questions / problems with this change. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
