Well well well, that wasn't supposed to go on the mailing list ;) george
On Jun 8, 2011, at 17:43 , George Bosilca wrote: > Hey if you want to push to the extreme the logic of the "computer scientist" > you were talking about in my office, then return the previous callback and > let the upper layer do the right thing. Suppose they don't screw up for once > ... > > george. > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 17:37 , Wesley Bland wrote: > >> Again, you are correct. Rather than just returning the previous callback (if >> any) I think it makes more sense to maintain a list of callbacks and have >> the errmgr call them directly. That way applications/ompi layers don't have >> to worry about calling another callback function. >>> >
