On Jun 16, 2011, at 3:47 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: >> I should say that if anyone is contemplating writing a new BTL, I'm happy >> to get on the phone / webex with you for an intro to the OMPI code base, >> point you in the right direction, etc. Ping me on/off list and we can >> setup a time. > > I guess there's also the possibility to write an mtl (like psm), or is this > discouraged?
Not discouraged at all. MTLs simply have a different model than BTLs. In short, MTLs are for networks that have matching semantics built-in (e.g., MX, portals, PSM, tports, ...etc.). BTLs are for everything else (sockets, shared memory, verbs, ...etc.). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
