I don't think we need to go that far; in fact, we really shouldn't use m4 macros to enforce license policies like that.
But more importantly, we should remove that particular warning from this test, since the test is used in places other than SLURM, which don't have negative licensing impact. Brian On 10/5/11 11:25 AM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: >It seems like this should be a field in ompi_info output, too... > >Maybe a component can effect a "license" m4 variable, or somesuch...? > > >On Oct 5, 2011, at 1:14 PM, hje...@osl.iu.edu wrote: > >> Author: hjelmn >> Date: 2011-10-05 13:14:24 EDT (Wed, 05 Oct 2011) >> New Revision: 25234 >> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/25234 >> >> Log: >> first cut at general pmi check >> Added: >> trunk/orte/config/orte_check_pmi.m4 >> >> Added: trunk/orte/config/orte_check_pmi.m4 >> >>========================================================================= >>===== >> --- (empty file) >> +++ trunk/orte/config/orte_check_pmi.m4 2011-10-05 13:14:24 EDT >>(Wed, 05 Oct 2011) >> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ >> +# -*- shell-script -*- >> +# >> +# Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Trustees of Indiana University and >>Indiana >> +# University Research and Technology >> +# Corporation. All rights reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The University of Tennessee and The >>University >> +# of Tennessee Research Foundation. All rights >> +# reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2004-2005 High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, >> +# University of Stuttgart. All rights >>reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Regents of the University of California. >> +# All rights reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. All rights >> +# reserved. >> +# $COPYRIGHT$ >> +# >> +# Additional copyrights may follow >> +# >> +# $HEADER$ >> +# >> + >> +# ORTE_CHECK_PMI(prefix, [action-if-found], [action-if-not-found]) >> +# -------------------------------------------------------- >> +AC_DEFUN([ORTE_CHECK_PMI],[ >> + AC_ARG_WITH([pmi], >> + [AC_HELP_STRING([--with-pmi], >> + [Build PMI support (default: no)])], >> + [], with_pmi=no) >> + orte_enable_pmi=0 >> + >> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([if user requested PMI support]) >> + AS_IF([test "$with_pmi" = "no"], [ >> + AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) >> + orte_want_pmi_support=no],[ >> + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) >> + AS_IF([test ! -z "$with_pmi" -a "$with_pmi" != "yes"],[ >> + AS_IF([test -d "$with_pmi/lib64"], LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS >>-L$with_pmi/lib64", >> + LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$with_pmi/lib") >> + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$with_pmi/include"],[]) >> + >> + orte_want_pmi_support=yes >> + orte_have_pmi_support=no >> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([if PMI support installed]) >> + AC_CHECK_HEADERS([pmi.h >>slurm/pmi.h],[orte_have_pmi_support=yes] >>[break],[],[AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT]) >> + AC_CHECK_LIB([pmi],[PMI_Init],[],orte_have_pmi_support=no) >> + AS_IF([test "$orte_have_pmi_support" = "yes"], [ >> + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) >> + AC_MSG_WARN([PMI SUPPORT HAS BEEN INCLUDED - RESULTING]) >> + AC_MSG_WARN([BINARIES ARE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LICENSING]) >> + AC_MSG_WARN([RESTRICTIONS - SEE THE SLURM LICENSE FOR >>INFO]) >> + orte_enable_pmi=1] [$2],[ >> + AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) >> + AC_MSG_WARN([PMI support requested (via --with-pmi) but >>not found.]) >> + AC_MSG_ERROR([Aborting.])] [$3])]) >> + AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([WANT_PMI_SUPPORT], >> + [$orte_enable_pmi], >> + [Whether we want PMI support]) >> +]) >> _______________________________________________ >> svn-full mailing list >> svn-f...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/svn-full > > >-- >Jeff Squyres >jsquy...@cisco.com >For corporate legal information go to: >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >de...@open-mpi.org >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > -- Brian W. Barrett Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software Sandia National Laboratories
