On Nov 8, 2011, at 18:32 , Ralph Castain wrote: > That was the experience - after thrashing for quite some time, we finally > found that the volatile qualifiers fixed the problem. Hence my request that > people check to see if anything is broken.
I will therefore propose to forever ban all compiler guys from this time-space, as now we have the undeniable proof that they concoct an evil plan against us. Otherwise, I can't explain how MPICH never had to add volatile to these particular variables and still support all these debuggers… george. > > >> >> -Paul >> >> On 11/8/2011 2:46 PM, George Bosilca wrote: >>> This value is not even read by the debugger. It only check for it's >>> existence in the startup process, so I guess we're safe here as well. >> >> -- >> Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov >> Future Technologies Group >> HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 >> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
