On Dec 13, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: >> Did David's suggestion help? > > It did, thanks - though I take David's point that there doesn't seem to > be any measurable difference between using local storage (or even tmpfs) > and Lustre for this so it seems like a warning that should be configurable.
Fair enough. We've definitely seen cases where the /tmp filesystem *did* matter, so perhaps it's a kernel version issue, or a phase of the moon issue, or... But yet, the point is valid that the message should be disable-able. Let me file a ticket about it... Done: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2937 -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
