Paul -- *Many* thanks for all of this; sorry for the slow followup. I've green lighted the 1.5 patch for netbsd (I think we need a corresponding fix posted for v1.4), and asked Terry to act on your Solaris comments.
We'll talk today on the call about what to do with OS X 10.3/ppc and opensbd ROMIO issues. On Jan 19, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > > I neglected to mention that all FreeBSD and OpenBSD tests were conducted > using GNU Make. > If I use /usr/bin/make (BSD make), then I encounter the same problem I > reported against ompi-1.5.5rc1: > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2954 > > Note that there is a patch (against 1.5.5rc1) attached to that ticket that > may be sufficient to fix this. > > Oddly, NetBSD doesn't display the problem. I don't know if there is > something different happening with respect to the atomics that simply avoids > the problem, or if NetBSD's version of Make may share the GNU Make behavior > with respect to VPATH. > > -Paul > > On 1/19/2012 1:33 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: >> >> Here is a report on my findings with "configure && make all && make install >> && make check" with ompi-1.4.5rc2. >> All platforms built the "self", "sm" and "tcp" btls. I've noted where >> addition btl/mtl components were built. >> >> PASS with no special configure arguments (just --prefix and things like >> "CFLAGS=-m64" when appropriate). >> This means GNU compilers were used in all cases. >> linux/x86 [including gm1, gm2 and elan] >> linux/x86-64 [including gm2, elan, ofud, openib and psm] >> linux/ia64 (SGI Altix) >> linux/ppc32 >> linux/ppc64 >> macos-10.4/x86 >> macos-10.4/ppc >> macos-10.5/x86 >> macos-10.5/ppc >> macos-10.6/x86 >> solaris-11(snv_151a)/amd64 [including ofud, openib and dapl] >> freebsd-6.3-RELEASE/amd64 >> freebsd-7.2-RELEASE/amd64 >> freebsd-8.2-RELEASE/amd64 >> freebsd-8.2-RELEASE/i386 >> netbsd-5.0.2/i386 >> netbsd-5.1/amd64 >> netbsd-5.1/i386 >> >> PASS with addition of --disable-io-romio >> openbsd-5.0/amd64 >> openbsd-5.0/i386 >> This need do disable ROMIO is "known", having been reported against 1.4.5rc1 >> (see http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/12/10086.php ) as >> well as against 1.4.3rc1 in the past (see >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2010/08/8338.php ). >> >> FAIL >> macos-10.3/ppc >> Same problem as reported against 1.4.5rc1 in >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/12/10086.php >> >> I have additional Solaris platforms which I will report on later. >> >> -Paul >> > > -- > Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov > Future Technologies Group > HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
