Nadia -- I committed the fix in the trunk to use HWLOC_WHOLE_SYSTEM and IO_DEVICES.
Do you want to revise your patch to use hwloc APIs with opal_hwloc_topology (instead of paffinity)? We could use that as a basis for the other places you identified that are doing similar things. On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Ah, okay - in that case, having the I/O device attached to the "closest" > object at each depth would be ideal from an OMPI perspective. > > On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> The bios usually tells you which numa location is close to each host-to-pci >> bridge. So the answer is yes. >> Brice >> >> >> Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> a écrit : >> I'm not sure I understand this comment. A PCI device is attached to the >> node, not to any specific location within the node, isn't it? Can you really >> say that a PCI device is "attached" to a specific NUMA location, for example? >> >> >> On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> >>> That doesn't seem too attractive from an OMPI perspective, though. We'd >>> want to know where the PCI devices are actually rooted. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
