On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the > branch it doesn't look like it has been touched.
Yeah, I've been thinking about this -- especially since you committed something relevant to mpiext the other day. You're right -- it hasn't been touched. How many extensions currently have fortran in them? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/