Hi George,

This fix seems insufficient for multibyte datatypes...
The correct increment of the pointers is length * extent, isn't it?

(2012/04/06 23:50), bosi...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: bosilca
> Date: 2012-04-06 10:50:04 EDT (Fri, 06 Apr 2012)
> New Revision: 26243
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26243
> 
> Log:
> Don't forget to move the pointers after the copy (only affects large data
> transfers).
> 
> Text files modified:
>     trunk/ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype.h |     5 ++++-
>     1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Modified: trunk/ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype.h
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype.h       (original)
> +++ trunk/ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype.h       2012-04-06 10:50:04 EDT (Fri, 
> 06 Apr 2012)
> @@ -289,8 +289,11 @@
>       while( 0 != count ) {
>           length = INT_MAX;
>           if( ((size_t)length)>  count ) length = (int32_t)count;
> -        rc = opal_datatype_copy_content_same_ddt(&type->super, count, 
> pDestBuf, pSrcBuf );
> +        rc = opal_datatype_copy_content_same_ddt(&type->super, length,
> +                                                  pDestBuf, pSrcBuf );
>           if( 0 != rc ) return rc;
> +        pDestBuf += (ptrdiff_t)length;
> +        pSrcBuf  += (ptrdiff_t)length;
>           count -= (size_t)length;
>       }
>       return 0;
> _______________________________________________
> svn-full mailing list
> svn-f...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/svn-full
> 
> 

-- 
富士通株式会社 次世代TC開発本部
ソフトウェア開発統括部 第四開発部
安達 知也 (ADACHI Tomoya) (adachi.tom...@jp.fujitsu.com)
tel: 7103-8632(内線) 044-754-8769(外線)

Reply via email to