On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:53 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > However, I did a quick grep and most of our headers are larger than a single > line of cache (even Itanium L2) so I suppose that making opal_cache_line_size > equal to the L2 cache line size will not be a too big waste of memory overall.
Easy to update the patch; done. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
