Ok. I'm parsing this to mean: v1.6 can proceed without further changes. There may be further changes that may be desirable for 1.6.x, however.
Right? On May 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote: >>> It causes no problems on/for the systems supported by trunk before >> the patch went in - it just means that in some situations it doesn't >> work on/for the systems enabled by that patch. >> >> I'm having trouble parsing that. :-) > > Sorry :) > >> Does this mean that we put in the patch, but it will cause no >> appreciable difference because, for target machine type X, it still >> won't work? > > That's the worst case scenario, yes. > > / > Leif > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
