Dear OpenMPI developers,

Could someone please review the attached patch?

Dmitri

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> On May 31, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>
>>>>> We should have AC macros for all of these already.
>>>>
>>>> OK, I'll try find them to support (1) usecase described below.
>>>
>>> No, I'll find them -- sorry, I meant to look them up before I sent the last 
>>> mail.  Let me look them up and get back to you.  Our configury is quite 
>>> complicated, and I know the right places to look.  :-)
>>
>> Ok, this might get a little complicated.  You'll probably need to use a pair 
>> of them (this is trunk only; it's different in v1.6 because we wholly 
>> revamped the trunk's Fortran support recently):
>>
>> 1. You can see all the OMPI_HAVE_FORTRAN_<type>'s at the top of mpi.h.in.  
>> These indicate whether the Fortran compiler supports these types or not.
>>
>> 2. We currently define *one* Fortran type in mpi.h.in: 
>> ompi_fortran_integer_t.  It looks like we need to add the rest of them: 
>> ompi_fortran_<type>_t (these are all in opal/include/opal_config.h, but 
>> mpi.h is a standalone, user-includeable file, which is why it replicates a 
>> subset of all the configure-generated results).  Here's a first stab at what 
>> I think will be needed in mpi.h.in:
>
> Hello Jeff,
>
> I would like to continue this discussion.  Corresponding changes in
> Clang are already in SVN and the feature should be released with the
> upcoming Clang 3.2.
>
> I tried to follow your advice about Fortran datatypes and updated the
> patch accordingly (attached).  This patch is against OpenMPI 1.9.
> Please review.
>
> Is there any chance we can get a less invasive (header-only, without
> autotools magic for Fortran datatypes support) change in the OpenMPI
> 1.7?
>
>> Does clang link together with gfortran?  I.e., does the following work:
>>
>>     ./configure CC=clang CXX=clang++ FC=gfortran ...
>
> Seems like it works.
>
> Dmitri
>
> --
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/



-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/

Attachment: ompi-v4.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to