On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Hjelm, Nathan T wrote: > Oh, and I don't know if you have tried this but we don't recreate the > keyval_lex.c file if it already exists. This allows use to not put a flex > requirement on the end user.
Why? Shouldn't we have a proper .l.c rule in the Makefile.am? Does that somehow cause tarball builds to invoke flex? And if so, should we put the .l.c rule in an automake conditional something like: if THIS_IS_A_DEVELOPER_BUILD .l.c: flex .... endif -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
