On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:43 PM, "Kawashima, Takahiro" <t-kawash...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Fujitsu is interested in completing MPI-2.2 on Open MPI and Open MPI > -based Fujitsu MPI. > > We've read wiki and tickets. These two tickets seem to be almost done > but need testing and bug fixing. > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2223 > MPI-2.2: MPI_Dist_graph_* functions missing > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/3127 > MPI-2.2: Add reduction support for MPI_C_*COMPLEX and MPI::*COMPLEX > > My colleagues are planning to work on these. They will write test codes > and try to fix bugs. Test codes and patches can be contributed to the > community. If they cannot fix some bugs, we will report details. They > are planning to complete them in around March. Great! > The latest statuses written in these ticket comments are correct? > Is there any more progress? > > Where are the latest codes? > In ticket #2223 says it is on Jeff's ompi-topo-fixes bitbucket branch. > https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes > But Jeff seems to have one more branch with a similar name. > https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes-fixed You are correct; I should update #2223 -- the "-fixed" one is the right one. I think the original one got hosed somehow, and I created the "-fixed" one for all future commits. George and I did a bunch of work on this ticket, but AFAIK, it never got finished. It might be within a delta of debugging, though. I notice that some of the IBM topology tests are failing (i.e., not Dist_graph stuff -- normal topology stuff). So something possibly got a little hosed in the topo base in the revamp. And then, as mentioned on the ticket, there's no Dist_graph tests to know what the status is of the implementation of those functions. > Ticket #3127 says it is on Jeff's mpi22-c-complex bitbucket branch. > But there is no such branch now. > https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/mpi22-c-complex Oops -- I put it back. It looks like I did one commit that is annotated "First cut -- doesn't work yet." I think the last status on that ticket is probably accurate. I updated both bitbuckets this morning to be at the head of the SVN trunk, so they're good and recent. Let me know if you want to fork/do pull requests, or if you just want write access to those repos. Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
