On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Steve Wise <sw...@opengridcomputing.com> wrote:

> Do you know if the rdmacm CPC is really being used for your connection setup 
> (vs other CPCs supported by IB)?  Cuz iwarp only supports rdmacm.  Maybe 
> that's the difference?

Dunno for certain, but I expect it is using the OOB cm since I didn't direct it 
to do anything different. Like I said, I suspect the problem is that the 
cluster doesn't have iWARP on it.

> 
> Steve.
> 
> On 1/28/2013 1:47 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Nope - still works just fine. I didn't receive that warning at all, and it 
>> ran to completion without problem.
>> 
>> I suspect the problem is that the system I can use just isn't configured 
>> like yours, and so I can't trigger the problem. Afraid I can't be of help 
>> after all... :-(
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Steve Wise <sw...@opengridcomputing.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1/28/2013 12:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>> Hmmm...afraid I cannot replicate this using the current state of the 1.6 
>>>> branch (which is the 1.6.4rcN) on the only IB-based cluster I can access.
>>>> 
>>>> Can you try it with a 1.6.4 tarball and see if you still see the problem? 
>>>> Could be someone already fixed it.
>>> I still hit it on 1.6.4rc2.
>>> 
>>> Note iWARP != IB so you may not have this issue on IB systems for various 
>>> reasons.  Did you use the same mpirun line? Namely using this:
>>> 
>>> --mca btl_openib_ipaddr_include "192.168.170.0/24"
>>> 
>>> (adjusted to your network config).
>>> 
>>> Because if I don't use ipaddr_include, then I don't see this issue on my 
>>> setup.
>>> 
>>> Also, did you see these logged:
>>> 
>>> Right after starting the job:
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> No OpenFabrics connection schemes reported that they were able to be
>>> used on a specific port.  As such, the openib BTL (OpenFabrics
>>> support) will be disabled for this port.
>>> 
>>>  Local host:           hpc-hn1.ogc.int
>>>  Local device:         cxgb4_0
>>>  Local port:           2
>>>  CPCs attempted:       oob, xoob, rdmacm
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> At the end of the job:
>>> 
>>> [hpc-hn1.ogc.int:07850] 5 more processes have sent help message 
>>> help-mpi-btl-openib-cpc-base.txt / no cpcs for port
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think these are benign, but prolly indicate a bug: the mpirun is 
>>> restricting the job to use port 1 only, so the CPCs shouldn't be attempting 
>>> port 2...
>>> 
>>> Steve.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Steve Wise <sw...@opengridcomputing.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/28/2013 11:48 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Steve Wise <sw...@opengridcomputing.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 1/25/2013 12:19 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm tracking an issue I see in openmpi-1.6.3.  Running this command on 
>>>>>>>> my chelsio iwarp/rdma setup causes a seg fault every time:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> /usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-1.6.3-dbg/bin/mpirun --np 2 --host 
>>>>>>>> hpc-hn1,hpc-cn2 --mca btl openib,sm,self --mca 
>>>>>>>> btl_openib_ipaddr_include "192.168.170.0/24" 
>>>>>>>> /usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-1.6.3/tests/IMB-3.2/IMB-MPI1 pingpong
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The segfault is during finalization, and I've debugged this to the 
>>>>>>>> point were I see a call to dereg_mem() after the openib blt is 
>>>>>>>> unloaded via dlclose().  dereg_mem() dereferences a function pointer 
>>>>>>>> to call the btl-specific dereg function, in this case it is 
>>>>>>>> openib_dereg_mr().  However, since that btl has already been unloaded, 
>>>>>>>> the deref causes a seg fault.  Happens every time with the above mpi 
>>>>>>>> job.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Now, I tried this same experiment with openmpi-1.7rc6 and I don't see 
>>>>>>>> the seg fault, and I don't see a call to dereg_mem() after the openib 
>>>>>>>> btl is unloaded.  That's all well good. :)  But I'd like to get this 
>>>>>>>> fix pushed into 1.6 since that is the current stable release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Question:  Can someone point me to the fix in 1.7?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Steve.
>>>>>>> It appears that in ompi_mpi_finalize(), mca_pml_base_close() is called 
>>>>>>> which unloads the openib btl.  Then further down in 
>>>>>>> ompi_mpi_finalize(), mca_mpool_base_close() is called which ends up 
>>>>>>> calling dereg_mem() which seg faults trying to call into the unloaded 
>>>>>>> openib btl.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That definitely sounds like a bug
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Anybody have thoughts?  Anybody care? :)
>>>>>> I care! It needs to be fixed - I'll take a look. Probably something that 
>>>>>> forgot to be cmr'd.
>>>>> Great!  If you want me to try out a fix or gather more debug, just hollar.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steve.
>>>>> 
> 


Reply via email to