Re: [OMPI devel] Simplified: Misuse or bug with nested types?

[Eric Chamberland]

another information: I just tested the example with Intel MPI 4.0.1.007 
and it works correctly...

So the problem seems to be only with OpenMPI... which is the default 
distribution we use... :-/

Is my example code too long?

Eric

Le 2013-04-23 09:55, Eric Chamberland a écrit :
Sorry,

here is the attachment...

Eric

On 04/23/2013 09:54 AM, Eric Chamberland wrote:
Hi,

I have sent a previous message showing something that I think is a bug
(or maybe a misuse, but...).

I worked on the example sent to have it simplified: now it is almost
half of the lines of code and the structures are more simple... but
still showing the wrong behaviour.

Briefly, we construct different MPI_datatype and nests them into a final
type which is a:
{MPI_LONG,{{MPI_LONG,MPI_CHAR}*2}

Here is the output from OpenMPI 1.6.3:

  Rank 0 send this:
  i: 0 => {{0},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 1 => {{1},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 2 => {{2},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 3 => {{3},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 4 => {{4},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 5 => {{5},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
MPI_Recv returned success and everything in MPI_Status is correct after
receive.
  Rank 1 received this:
  i: 0 => {{0},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****
  i: 1 => {{1},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****
  i: 2 => {{2},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****
  i: 3 => {{3},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****
  i: 4 => {{4},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****
  i: 5 => {{5},{{3,%},{-999,$}}} *** ERROR ****

Here is the expected output, obtained with mpich-3.0.3:

  Rank 0 send this:
  i: 0 => {{0},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 1 => {{1},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 2 => {{2},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 3 => {{3},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 4 => {{4},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
  i: 5 => {{5},{{3,%},{7,5}}}
MPI_Recv returned success and everything in MPI_Status is correct after
receive.
  Rank 1 received this:
  i: 0 => {{0},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK
  i: 1 => {{1},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK
  i: 2 => {{2},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK
  i: 3 => {{3},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK
  i: 4 => {{4},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK
  i: 5 => {{5},{{3,%},{7,5}}} OK

Is it related to the bug reported here:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2013/04/12267.php ?

Thanks,

Eric


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel