Hi,
This MPI-2.2 feature does not seem to be implemented yet in trunk.
How about my patches posted 3 months ago? They can be applied to
the latest trunk. If you don't like them, I can improve it.
I've attached same patches to this mail again. One for the implementation
of this MPI-2.2 feature and another for bug fixes, as described in
my previous mail.
Regards,
KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> Jeff, George,
>
> I've implemented George's idea for ticket #3123 "MPI-2.2: Ordering of
> attribution deletion callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF". See attached
> delete-attr-order.patch.
>
> It is implemented by creating a temporal array of ordered attribute_value_t
> pointers at ompi_attr_delete_all() call using attribute creation sequence
> numbers. It requires linear cost only at the communicator destruction
> stage and its implementation is rather simpler than my previous patch.
>
> And apart from this MPI-2.2 ticket, I found some minor bugs and typos
> in attribute.c and attribute.h. They can be fixed by the attached
> attribute-bug-fix.patch. All fixes are assembled into one patch file.
>
> I've pushed my modifications to Bitbucket.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/rivis/openmpi-delattrorder/src/49bf3dc7cdbc/?at=sequence
> Note that my modifications are in "sequence" branch, not "default" branch.
> I had committed each implementation/fixes independently that are
> assembled in two patches attached to this mail. So you can see
> comment/diff of each modification on Bitbucket.
> https://bitbucket.org/rivis/openmpi-delattrorder/commits/all
> Changesets eaa2432 and ace994b are for ticket #3123,
> and other 7 latest changesets are for bug/typo-fixes.
>
> Regards,
> KAWASHIMA Takahiro
>
> > Jeff,
> >
> > OK. I'll try implementing George's idea and then you can compare which
> > one is simpler.
> >
> > Regards,
> > KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> >
> > > Not that I'm aware of; that would be great.
> > >
> > > Unlike George, however, I'm not concerned about converting to linear
> > > operations for attributes.
> > >
> > > Attributes are not used often, but when they are:
> > >
> > > a) there aren't many of them (so a linear penalty is trivial)
> > > b) they're expected to be low performance
> > >
> > > So if it makes the code simpler, I certainly don't mind linear operations.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:32 AM, KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> > > <rivis.kawash...@nifty.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > George,
> > > >
> > > > Your idea makes sense.
> > > > Is anyone working on it? If not, I'll try.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> > > >
> > > >> Takahiro,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the patch. I deplore the lost of the hash table in the
> > > >> attribute management, as the potential of transforming all attributes
> > > >> operation to a linear complexity is not very appealing.
> > > >>
> > > >> As you already took the decision C, it means that at the communicator
> > > >> destruction stage the hash table is not relevant anymore. Thus, I
> > > >> would have converted the hash table to an ordered list (ordered by the
> > > >> creation index, a global entity atomically updated every time an
> > > >> attribute is created), and proceed to destroy the attributed in the
> > > >> desired order. Thus instead of having a linear operation for every
> > > >> operation on attributes, we only have a single linear operation per
> > > >> communicator (and this during the destruction stage).
> > > >>
> > > >> George.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Jan 16, 2013, at 16:37 , KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> > > >> <rivis.kawash...@nifty.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've implemented ticket #3123 "MPI-2.2: Ordering of attribution
> > > >>> deletion
> > > >>> callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF".
> > > >>>
> > > >>> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/3123
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As this ticket says, attributes had been stored in unordered hash.
> > > >>> So I've replaced opal_hash_table_t with opal_list_t and made necessary
> > > >>> modifications for it. And I've also fixed some multi-threaded
> > > >>> concurrent
> > > >>> (get|set|delete)_attr call issues.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> By this modification, following behavior changes are introduced.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (A) MPI_(Comm|Type|Win)_(get|set|delete)_attr function may be slower
> > > >>> for MPI objects that has many attributes attached.
> > > >>> (B) When the user-defined delete callback function is called, the
> > > >>> attribute is already removed from the list. In other words,
> > > >>> if MPI_(Comm|Type|Win)_get_attr is called by the user-defined
> > > >>> delete callback function for the same attribute key, it returns
> > > >>> flag = false.
> > > >>> (C) Even if the user-defined delete callback function returns non-
> > > >>> MPI_SUCCESS value, the attribute is not reverted to the list.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (A) is due to a sequential list search instead of a hash. See
> > > >>> find_value
> > > >>> function for its implementation.
> > > >>> (B) and (C) are due to an atomic deletion of the attribute to allow
> > > >>> multi-threaded concurrent (get|set|delete)_attr call in
> > > >>> MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE.
> > > >>> See ompi_attr_delete function for its implementation. I think this
> > > >>> does
> > > >>> not matter because MPI standard doesn't specify behavior in such
> > > >>> cases.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The patch for Open MPI trunk is attached. If you like it, take in
> > > >>> this patch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Though I'm a employee of a company, this is my independent and private
> > > >>> work at my home. No intellectual property from my company. If needed,
> > > >>> I'll sign to Individual Contributor License Agreement.
diff -r 287add548d08 -r ace994b1dd57 ompi/attribute/attribute.c
--- a/ompi/attribute/attribute.c Sat Jan 19 14:48:31 2013 +0000
+++ b/ompi/attribute/attribute.c Thu Jan 24 20:02:59 2013 +0900
@@ -353,10 +353,12 @@
*/
typedef struct attribute_value_t {
opal_object_t super;
+ int av_key;
void *av_value;
MPI_Aint *av_address_kind_pointer;
MPI_Fint *av_integer_pointer;
int av_set_from;
+ int av_sequence;
} attribute_value_t;
@@ -375,6 +377,7 @@
static void *translate_to_c(attribute_value_t *val);
static MPI_Fint translate_to_fortran_mpi1(attribute_value_t *val);
static MPI_Aint translate_to_fortran_mpi2(attribute_value_t *val);
+static int compare_attr_sequence(const void *attr1, const void *attr2);
/*
@@ -401,6 +404,7 @@
static opal_hash_table_t *keyval_hash;
static opal_bitmap_t *key_bitmap;
+static int attr_sequence;
static unsigned int int_pos = 12345;
/*
@@ -427,9 +431,11 @@
*/
static void attribute_value_construct(attribute_value_t *item)
{
+ item->av_key = MPI_KEYVAL_INVALID;
item->av_address_kind_pointer = (MPI_Aint*) &item->av_value;
item->av_integer_pointer = &(((MPI_Fint*) &item->av_value)[int_pos]);
item->av_set_from = 0;
+ item->av_sequence = -1;
}
@@ -983,52 +989,60 @@
int ompi_attr_delete_all(ompi_attribute_type_t type, void *object,
opal_hash_table_t *attr_hash)
{
- int key_ret, del_ret;
- uint32_t key, oldkey;
- void *node, *in_node, *old_attr;
+ int ret, i, num_attrs;
+ uint32_t key;
+ void *node, *in_node, *attr;
+ attribute_value_t **attrs;
/* Ensure that the table is not empty */
if (NULL == attr_hash) {
return MPI_SUCCESS;
}
-
- /* Lock this whole sequence of events -- don't let any other
- thread modify the structure of the attribute hash or bitmap
- while we're traversing it */
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
- /* Get the first key in local object's hash */
- key_ret = opal_hash_table_get_first_key_uint32(attr_hash,
- &key, &old_attr,
- &node);
+
+ /* Make an array that contains all attributes in local object's hash */
+
+ num_attrs = opal_hash_table_get_size(attr_hash);
+ if (0 == num_attrs) {
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ return MPI_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
+ attrs = malloc(sizeof(attribute_value_t *) * num_attrs);
+ if (NULL == attrs) {
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ return MPI_ERR_SYSRESOURCE;
+ }
+
+ ret = opal_hash_table_get_first_key_uint32(attr_hash, &key, &attr, &node);
+ for (i = 0; OMPI_SUCCESS == ret; i++) {
+ attrs[i] = attr;
+ in_node = node;
+ ret = opal_hash_table_get_next_key_uint32(attr_hash, &key, &attr,
+ in_node, &node);
+ }
+
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
- del_ret = OMPI_SUCCESS;
- while (OMPI_SUCCESS == key_ret && OMPI_SUCCESS == del_ret) {
+ /* Sort attributes in the order that they were set */
+ qsort(attrs, num_attrs, sizeof(attribute_value_t *), compare_attr_sequence);
- /* Save this node info for deletion, before we move onto the
- next node */
-
- in_node = node;
- oldkey = key;
-
- /* Move to the next node */
-
- OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
- key_ret = opal_hash_table_get_next_key_uint32(attr_hash,
- &key, &old_attr,
- in_node, &node);
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
-
- /* Now delete this attribute */
-
- del_ret = ompi_attr_delete(type, object, attr_hash, oldkey, true);
+ /* Delete attributes in the reverse order that they were set.
+ Actually this ordering is required only for MPI_COMM_SELF, as specified
+ in MPI-2.2: 8.7.1 Allowing User Functions at Process Termination. */
+ for (i = num_attrs - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ ret = ompi_attr_delete(type, object, attr_hash, attrs[i]->av_key, true);
+ if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
+ break;
+ }
}
/* All done */
- return del_ret;
+ free(attrs);
+ return ret;
}
/*************************************************************************/
@@ -1108,6 +1122,9 @@
return OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM;
}
+ new_attr->av_key = key;
+ new_attr->av_sequence = attr_sequence++;
+
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
ret = opal_hash_table_set_value_uint32(*attr_hash, key, new_attr);
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
@@ -1272,3 +1289,12 @@
return 0;
}
}
+
+/*
+ * Comparator for qsort() to sort attributes in the order that they were set.
+ */
+static int compare_attr_sequence(const void *attr1, const void *attr2)
+{
+ return (*(attribute_value_t **)attr1)->av_sequence -
+ (*(attribute_value_t **)attr2)->av_sequence;
+}
diff -r ace994b1dd57 -r 49bf3dc7cdbc ompi/attribute/attribute.c
--- a/ompi/attribute/attribute.c Thu Jan 24 20:02:59 2013 +0900
+++ b/ompi/attribute/attribute.c Fri Jan 25 00:03:48 2013 +0900
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@
*
* Example A: INTEGER ret
* CALL MPI_ATTR_GET(..., ret, ierr)
- * --> ret will equal &foo, possibly truncaed
+ * --> ret will equal &foo, possibly truncated
* Example B: INTEGER ret
* CALL MPI_ATTR_GET(..., ret, ierr)
- * --> ret will equal &bar, possibly truncaed
+ * --> ret will equal &bar, possibly truncated
*
* 3. Fortran MPI-2 reads the attribute value. The C pointer is cast
* to a fortran INTEGER(KIND=MPI_ADDRESS_KIND) (i.e., a (MPI_Aint)).
@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@
(&(((ompi_##type##_t *)object)->attr_##type##_f), \
&f_key, &attr_val, &keyval_obj->extra_state.f_integer, &f_err); \
if (MPI_SUCCESS != OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err)) { \
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err); \
} \
} \
@@ -267,7 +266,6 @@
(&(((ompi_##type##_t *)object)->attr_##type##_f), \
&f_key, (int*)&attr_val, &keyval_obj->extra_state.f_address, &f_err); \
if (MPI_SUCCESS != OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err)) { \
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err); \
} \
} \
@@ -279,7 +277,6 @@
((ompi_##type##_t *)object, \
key, attr_val, \
keyval_obj->extra_state.c_ptr)) != MPI_SUCCESS) {\
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return err;\
} \
}
@@ -301,7 +298,6 @@
&f_key, &keyval_obj->extra_state.f_integer, \
&in, &out, &f_flag, &f_err); \
if (MPI_SUCCESS != OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err)) { \
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err); \
} \
out_attr->av_value = (void*) 0; \
@@ -317,7 +313,6 @@
&f_key, &keyval_obj->extra_state.f_address, &in, &out, \
&f_flag, &f_err); \
if (MPI_SUCCESS != OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err)) { \
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return OMPI_FINT_2_INT(f_err); \
} \
out_attr->av_value = (void *) out; \
@@ -331,7 +326,6 @@
if ((err = (*((keyval_obj->copy_attr_fn).attr_##type##_copy_fn)) \
((ompi_##type##_t *)old_object, key, keyval_obj->extra_state.c_ptr, \
in, &out, &flag, (ompi_##type##_t *)(new_object))) != MPI_SUCCESS) { \
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock); \
return err; \
} \
out_attr->av_value = out; \
@@ -535,6 +529,8 @@
int ret;
ret = ompi_attr_free_predefined();
+ OBJ_DESTRUCT(&keyval_hash_lock);
+ OBJ_DESTRUCT(&attr_hash_lock);
OBJ_RELEASE(keyval_hash);
OBJ_RELEASE(key_bitmap);
@@ -583,7 +579,7 @@
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
OBJ_RELEASE(keyval);
} else {
- ret = MPI_SUCCESS;
+ ret = MPI_SUCCESS;
}
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
@@ -690,24 +686,24 @@
(keyval->attr_type!= type) ||
((!predefined) && (keyval->attr_flag & OMPI_KEYVAL_PREDEFINED))) {
ret = OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM;
- return ret;
+ return ret;
}
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
/* Ensure that we don't have an empty attr_hash */
if (NULL == attr_hash) {
ret = OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM;
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
- return ret;
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ return ret;
}
/* Check if the key is valid for the communicator/window/dtype. If
yes, then delete the attribute and key entry from the object's
hash */
- /* Note that this function can be invoked by
- ompi_attr_delete_all() to set attributes on the new object (in
- addition to the top-level MPI_* functions that set attributes). */
+ /* Note that this function can be invoked by ompi_attr_delete_all()
+ to delete attributes on the object (in addition to the top-level
+ MPI_* functions that delete attributes). */
ret = opal_hash_table_get_value_uint32(attr_hash, key, (void**) &attr);
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
@@ -730,11 +726,12 @@
ret = MPI_ERR_INTERN;
goto exit;
}
+
+ OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ ret = opal_hash_table_remove_value_uint32(attr_hash, key);
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+
OBJ_RELEASE(attr);
-
- OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
- ret = opal_hash_table_remove_value_uint32(attr_hash, key);
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
goto exit;
@@ -767,6 +764,7 @@
opal_hash_table_t **attr_hash,
int key, void *attribute, bool predefined)
{
+ int ret;
attribute_value_t *new_attr = OBJ_NEW(attribute_value_t);
if (NULL == new_attr) {
return MPI_ERR_SYSRESOURCE;
@@ -774,8 +772,12 @@
new_attr->av_value = attribute;
new_attr->av_set_from = OMPI_ATTRIBUTE_C;
- return set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr,
- predefined);
+ ret = set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr, predefined);
+ if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
+ OBJ_RELEASE(new_attr);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
@@ -788,6 +790,7 @@
int key, MPI_Fint attribute,
bool predefined)
{
+ int ret;
attribute_value_t *new_attr = OBJ_NEW(attribute_value_t);
if (NULL == new_attr) {
return MPI_ERR_SYSRESOURCE;
@@ -796,8 +799,12 @@
new_attr->av_value = (void *) 0;
*new_attr->av_integer_pointer = attribute;
new_attr->av_set_from = OMPI_ATTRIBUTE_FORTRAN_MPI1;
- return set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr,
- predefined);
+ ret = set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr, predefined);
+ if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
+ OBJ_RELEASE(new_attr);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
@@ -810,6 +817,7 @@
int key, MPI_Aint attribute,
bool predefined)
{
+ int ret;
attribute_value_t *new_attr = OBJ_NEW(attribute_value_t);
if (NULL == new_attr) {
return MPI_ERR_SYSRESOURCE;
@@ -817,8 +825,12 @@
new_attr->av_value = (void *) attribute;
new_attr->av_set_from = OMPI_ATTRIBUTE_FORTRAN_MPI2;
- return set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr,
- predefined);
+ ret = set_value(type, object, attr_hash, key, new_attr, predefined);
+ if (OMPI_SUCCESS != ret) {
+ OBJ_RELEASE(new_attr);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
@@ -835,6 +847,8 @@
ret = get_value(attr_hash, key, &val, flag);
if (MPI_SUCCESS == ret && 1 == *flag) {
*attribute = translate_to_c(val);
+ /* Decrement the reference count. See comment in get_value(). */
+ OBJ_RELEASE(val);
}
return ret;
@@ -854,6 +868,8 @@
ret = get_value(attr_hash, key, &val, flag);
if (MPI_SUCCESS == ret && 1 == *flag) {
*attribute = translate_to_fortran_mpi1(val);
+ /* Decrement the reference count. See comment in get_value(). */
+ OBJ_RELEASE(val);
}
return ret;
@@ -873,6 +889,8 @@
ret = get_value(attr_hash, key, &val, flag);
if (MPI_SUCCESS == ret && 1 == *flag) {
*attribute = translate_to_fortran_mpi2(val);
+ /* Decrement the reference count. See comment in get_value(). */
+ OBJ_RELEASE(val);
}
return ret;
@@ -901,7 +919,7 @@
}
/* Lock this whole sequence of events -- don't let any other
- thread modify the structure of the attrbitue hash or bitmap
+ thread modify the structure of the attribute hash or bitmap
while we're traversing it */
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
@@ -918,10 +936,10 @@
/* Get the keyval in the main keyval hash - so that we know
what the copy_attr_fn is */
- OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
+ OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
err = opal_hash_table_get_value_uint32(keyval_hash, key,
(void **) &hash_value);
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
new_attr = OBJ_NEW(attribute_value_t);
switch (type) {
@@ -970,11 +988,11 @@
OBJ_RELEASE(new_attr);
}
- OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
ret = opal_hash_table_get_next_key_uint32(oldattr_hash, &key,
(void **) &old_attr,
in_node, &node);
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
}
/* All done */
@@ -1107,19 +1125,18 @@
return MPI_ERR_INTERN;
}
had_old = true;
- OBJ_RELEASE(old_attr);
}
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
ret = opal_hash_table_get_value_uint32(keyval_hash, key,
(void **) &keyval);
if ((OMPI_SUCCESS != ret ) || (NULL == keyval)) {
- /* Keyval has disappeared underneath us. Someone must have
- called ompi_attr_free_keyval since we last looked it up
- in the hash. We'll behave as if we never found it in the
- first place */
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
- return OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM;
+ /* Keyval has disappeared underneath us. Someone must have
+ called ompi_attr_free_keyval since we last looked it up
+ in the hash. We'll behave as if we never found it in the
+ first place */
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
+ return OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM;
}
new_attr->av_key = key;
@@ -1130,6 +1147,13 @@
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&keyval_hash_lock);
+ if (had_old) {
+ /* We must delay releasing old_attr until it is overwritten
+ by new_attr in attr_hash, because released old_attr should
+ not be referenced in get_value() in another thread. */
+ OBJ_RELEASE(old_attr);
+ }
+
/* Increase the reference count of the object, only if there was no
old atribute/no old entry in the object's key hash */
@@ -1179,16 +1203,23 @@
OPAL_THREAD_LOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
if (NULL == attr_hash) {
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
ret = opal_hash_table_get_value_uint32(attr_hash, key, &attr);
- OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
if (OMPI_SUCCESS == ret) {
*attribute = (attribute_value_t*)attr;
*flag = 1;
+ /* The attribute value may be deleted in another thread concurrently
+ before the caller function (ompi_attr_get_c etc.) reads actual
+ pointer/integer value. To avoid the attribute_value_t object
+ being freed, increase the reference count here and decrease it
+ in the caller function. */
+ OBJ_RETAIN(*attribute);
}
+ OPAL_THREAD_UNLOCK(&attr_hash_lock);
+
return OMPI_SUCCESS;
}
diff -r ace994b1dd57 -r 49bf3dc7cdbc ompi/attribute/attribute.h
--- a/ompi/attribute/attribute.h Thu Jan 24 20:02:59 2013 +0900
+++ b/ompi/attribute/attribute.h Fri Jan 25 00:03:48 2013 +0900
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@
static inline
int ompi_attr_hash_init(opal_hash_table_t **hash)
{
- *hash = OBJ_NEW(opal_hash_table_t);
- if (NULL == hash) {
+ *hash = OBJ_NEW(opal_hash_table_t);
+ if (NULL == *hash) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error while creating the local attribute list\n");
return MPI_ERR_SYSRESOURCE;
}
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@
* Get an attribute on the comm/win/datatype in a form valid for
* Fortran MPI-2.
*
- * @param attrhash The attribute hash table hanging on the object(IN)
+ * @param attr_hash The attribute hash table hanging on the object(IN)
* @param key Key val for the attribute (IN)
* @param attribute The actual attribute pointer (OUT)
* @param flag Flag whether an attribute is associated
@@ -471,21 +471,21 @@
/**
- * This to be used from functions like MPI_*_DUP inorder to copy all
+ * This to be used from functions like MPI_*_DUP in order to copy all
* the attributes from the old Comm/Win/Dtype object to a new
* object.
* @param type Type of attribute (COMM/WIN/DTYPE) (IN)
* @param old_object The old COMM/WIN/DTYPE object (IN)
* @param new_object The new COMM/WIN/DTYPE object (IN)
- * @param attr_hash The attribute hash table hanging on old object(IN)
+ * @param oldattr_hash The attribute hash table hanging on old object(IN)
* @param newattr_hash The attribute hash table hanging on new object(IN)
* @return OMPI error code
*
*/
int ompi_attr_copy_all(ompi_attribute_type_t type, void *old_object,
- void *new_object, opal_hash_table_t *oldattr_hash,
- opal_hash_table_t *newkeyhash);
+ void *new_object, opal_hash_table_t *oldattr_hash,
+ opal_hash_table_t *newattr_hash);
/**
