In working on the upcoming Cisco USNIC BTL, we noticed that btl.sendi is invoked by OB1 in the non-MCA_BTL_FLAGS_SEND_INPLACE case.
Is there a reason for this? Or is it only because no one who uses INPLACE has cared about sendi? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
