-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/13 17:06, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> Bringing up a new IBM SandyBridge cluster I'm running a NAMD test
> case and noticed that if I run it with srun rather than mpirun it
> goes over 20% slower.
Following on from this issue, we've found that whilst mpirun gives
acceptable performance the memory accounting doesn't appear to be correct.
Anyone seen anything similar, or any ideas on what could be going on?
Here are two identical NAMD jobs running over 69 nodes using 16 nodes
per core, this one launched with mpirun (Open-MPI 1.6.5):
==> slurm-94491.out <==
WallClock: 101.176193 CPUTime: 101.176193 Memory: 1268.554688 MB
End of program
[samuel@barcoo-test Mem]$ sacct -j 94491 -o JobID,MaxRSS,MaxVMSize
JobID MaxRSS MaxVMSize
- ------------ ---------- ----------
94491
94491.batch 6504068K 11167820K
94491.0 5952048K 9028060K
This one launched with srun (about 60% slower):
==> slurm-94505.out <==
WallClock: 163.314163 CPUTime: 163.314163 Memory: 1253.511719 MB
End of program
[samuel@barcoo-test Mem]$ sacct -j 94505 -o JobID,MaxRSS,MaxVMSize
JobID MaxRSS MaxVMSize
- ------------ ---------- ----------
94505
94505.batch 7248K 1582692K
94505.0 1022744K 1307112K
cheers!
Chris
- --
Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIB5sEACgkQO2KABBYQAh9QMQCfQ57w0YqVDwgyGRqUe3dSvQDj
e9cAnRRx/kDNUNqUCuFGY87mXf2fMOr+
=JUPK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
