-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joshua,
On 23/07/13 19:34, Joshua Ladd wrote: > The proposed solution that "we" (OMPI + SLURM) have come up with > is to modify OMPI to support PMI2 and to use SLURM 2.6 which has > support for PMI2 and is (allegedly) much more scalable than PMI1. > Several folks in the combined communities are working hard, as we > speak, trying to get this functional to see if it indeed makes a > difference. Stay tuned, Chris. Hopefully we will have some data by > the end of the week. Is there any news on this? We'd love to be able to test this out if we can as I currently see a 60% penalty with srun with my test NAMD job from our tame MM person. thanks! Chris - -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIDHbQACgkQO2KABBYQAh8vjgCgjPFB354t8dldPEA3pw2IHHze vB4Ani5vfK+9+BkbRF92FGhtB4eyIF1u =KoTt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
