Ralph -

I think those warnings are just because of when they last synced with the
trunk; it looks like they haven't updated in the last week, when those
(and some usnic fixes) went in.

More concerning is the --enable-picky stuff and the disabling of SHMEM in
the right places.

Brian

On 8/11/13 11:24 AM, "Ralph Castain" <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

>Turning off the enable_picky, I get it to compile with the following
>warnings:
>
>pget_elements_x_f.c:70: warning: no previous prototype for
>'ompi_get_elements_x_f'
>pstatus_set_elements_x_f.c:70: warning: no previous prototype for
>'ompi_status_set_elements_x_f'
>ptype_get_extent_x_f.c:69: warning: no previous prototype for
>'ompi_type_get_extent_x_f'
>ptype_get_true_extent_x_f.c:69: warning: no previous prototype for
>'ompi_type_get_true_extent_x_f'
>ptype_size_x_f.c:69: warning: no previous prototype for
>'ompi_type_size_x_f'
>
>I also found that OpenShmem is still building by default. Is that
>intended? I thought you were only going to build if --with-shmem (or
>whatever option) was given.
>
>Looks like some cleanup is required
>
>On Aug 10, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I couldn't get it to build - this is on a simple Xeon-based
>>system under CentOS 6.2:
>> 
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> spml_yoda_getreq.c: In function 'mca_spml_yoda_get_completion':
>> spml_yoda_getreq.c:98: error: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
>>'opal_atomic_add_32' differ in signedness
>> ../../../../opal/include/opal/sys/amd64/atomic.h:174: note: expected
>>'volatile int32_t *' but argument is of type 'uint32_t *'
>> spml_yoda_getreq.c:98: error: signed and unsigned type in conditional
>>expression
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> spml_yoda_putreq.c: In function 'mca_spml_yoda_put_completion':
>> spml_yoda_putreq.c:81: error: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
>>'opal_atomic_add_32' differ in signedness
>> ../../../../opal/include/opal/sys/amd64/atomic.h:174: note: expected
>>'volatile int32_t *' but argument is of type 'uint32_t *'
>> spml_yoda_putreq.c:81: error: signed and unsigned type in conditional
>>expression
>> make[2]: *** [spml_yoda_getreq.lo] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[2]: *** [spml_yoda_putreq.lo] Error 1
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> spml_yoda.c: In function 'mca_spml_yoda_put_internal':
>> spml_yoda.c:725: error: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
>>'opal_atomic_add_32' differ in signedness
>> ../../../../opal/include/opal/sys/amd64/atomic.h:174: note: expected
>>'volatile int32_t *' but argument is of type 'uint32_t *'
>> spml_yoda.c:725: error: signed and unsigned type in conditional
>>expression
>> spml_yoda.c: In function 'mca_spml_yoda_get':
>> spml_yoda.c:1107: error: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
>>'opal_atomic_add_32' differ in signedness
>> ../../../../opal/include/opal/sys/amd64/atomic.h:174: note: expected
>>'volatile int32_t *' but argument is of type 'uint32_t *'
>> spml_yoda.c:1107: error: signed and unsigned type in conditional
>>expression
>> make[2]: *** [spml_yoda.lo] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> 
>> Only configure arguments:
>> 
>> enable_picky=yes
>> enable_debug=yes
>> 
>> 
>> gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 10, 2013, at 7:21 PM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwba...@sandia.gov>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/6/13 10:30 AM, "Joshua Ladd" <josh...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear OMPI Community,
>>>> 
>>>> Please find on Bitbucket the latest round of OSHMEM changes based on
>>>> community feedback. Please git and test at your leisure.
>>>> 
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/jladd_math/mlnx-oshmem.git
>>> 
>>> Josh -
>>> 
>>> In general, I think everything looks ok.  However, the "right" thing
>>> doesn't happen if the CM PML is used (at least, when using the Portals
>>>4
>>> MTL).  When configured with:
>>> 
>>> ./configure --enable-mca-no-build=pml-ob1,pml-bfo,pml-v,btl,bml,mpool
>>> 
>>> The build segfaults trying to run a SHMEM program:
>>> 
>>> mpirun -np 2 ./bcast
>>> [shannon:90397] *** Process received signal ***
>>> [shannon:90397] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
>>> [shannon:90397] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
>>> [shannon:90397] Failing at address: (nil)
>>> [shannon:90398] *** Process received signal ***
>>> [shannon:90398] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
>>> [shannon:90398] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
>>> [shannon:90398] Failing at address: (nil)
>>> [shannon:90397] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0() [0x38b7a0f4a0]
>>> [shannon:90397] *** End of error message ***
>>> [shannon:90398] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0() [0x38b7a0f4a0]
>>> [shannon:90398] *** End of error message ***
>>> 
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>--
>>> mpirun noticed that process rank 1 with PID 90398 on node shannon
>>>exited
>>> on signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
>>> 
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>--
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Brian W. Barrett
>>> Scalable System Software Group
>>> Sandia National Laboratories
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list
>de...@open-mpi.org
>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>


--
  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories




Reply via email to