will it be ok, that once all is ready, we push git2svn branch for this?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:

> I think Brian's point is that it should be a SVN branch.
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Mike Dubman <mi...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > This is exactly the way we handle it now. We have internal branch on top
> of v1.7 with all SHMEM code in it.
> > It runs mtt and other tests.
> >
> > Once we done with all changes - we will provide patch (and branch direct
> access if needed) for GK.
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Mike.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov>
> wrote:
> > All -
> >
> > Ralph and I talked today about the logistics of bringing the OpenSHMEM
> > code to the 1.7 release branch, as it's now a fairly large set of changes
> > from the trunk.  What we propose is to follow the same proceedure we used
> > when merging in the RTE framework change, which is essentially a staging
> > branch.  So, Mellanox (as the one filing the CMR) would branch from 1.7,
> > bring the OpenSHMEM changes into that (and hopefully test), and then file
> > a single CMR for the changes from the branch.  If done properly, the GK
> > then only has to merge with --reintegrate and we're set.
> >
> > Let's talk about it on the call tomorrow, but that's the current
> proposal.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > --
> >   Brian W. Barrett
> >   Scalable System Software Group
> >   Sandia National Laboratories
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>

Reply via email to