On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> If this approach is to be adopted by other components (and perhaps other > MPIs), then it would be important for the enumeration variable name to be > derived in a UNIFORM way: > <framework>_<component>_SOMETHING > Without a fixed value for "SOMETHING" somebody will need to read sources (or > documentation) to make the connection. This is a good point; we got a similar piece of feedback from the MPI tools group. How about naming the state variable "<framework>_<component>"? And then that will apply to all "<framework>_<component>*" pvars. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
