On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Ralph Castain <rhc.open...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jeff - you are jumping way ahead. I already said this needs further work to > resolve blocking. These patches (per Adrian's email) just makes things compile Fair enough. But in some ways, having uncompilable code is a *good* thing, because it tells you exactly where you need to work on the architecture. Just updating it to *compile* removes that safeguard -- will you remember/re-find all those places where it *used* to block and convert the architecture to workaround the blocking? I guess I'm saying: what exactly does updating it to compile get for us, if we know the code still won't work? It seems like all we'll be doing is removing the grep-able places where we *know* we'll have to do work in the future. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
