I think there's no problem with removing them from the dll code -- that stuff 
doesn't affect MPI application ABI.


On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote:

> Someone who understands the mpi debugging handles code:
> 
> The opal_progress_recursion_depth_counter and opal_progress_thread_counter
> are both only used internally in opal_progress (for book keeping, but
> never any decisions) and are declared in ompi_mpihandles_dll.c, but then
> don't appear to be used.  Is there a disadvantage to:
> 
> 1) removing them from mpihandles_dll.c
> 
> or, if that breaks ABI,
> 
> 2) Leaving them, but not doing the bookkeeping?
> 
> It's fairly heavyweight bookkeeping, so I agree with Nathan, I'd like to
> remove it.  But I'd like to remove it pre-1.7.4.  Which means today.
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> On 12/18/13 4:40 PM, "Nathan Hjelm" <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Opps, yeah. Meant 1.7.5. If people agree with this change I could
>> possibly slip it in before Friday but that is unlikely.
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:32:36PM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> Ummmm....1.7.4 is leaving the station on Fri, Nathan, so next Tues =>
>>> will have to go into 1.7.5
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What: Remove the opal_progress_recursion_depth_counter from
>>>> opal_progress.
>>>> 
>>>> Why: This counter adds two atomic adds to the critical path when
>>>> OPAL_HAVE_THREADS is set (which is the case for most builds). I
>>> grepped
>>>> through ompi, orte, and opal to find where this value was being used
>>> and
>>>> did not find anything either inside or outside opal_progress.
>>>> 
>>>> When: I want this change to go into 1.7.4 (if possible) so setting a
>>>> quick timeout for next Tuesday.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know if there is a good reason to keep this counter and it will
>>>> be spared.
>>>> 
>>>> -Nathan Hjelm
>>>> HPC-5, LANL
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Brian W. Barrett
>  Scalable System Software Group
>  Sandia National Laboratories
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to