Building the trunk on FreeBSD-9/x86-64, and using gmake to work around the non-portable examples/Makefile, I *still* encounter issues with shmemfort when running "gmake" in the examples subdirectory:
$ gmake mpicc -g hello_c.c -o hello_c mpicc -g ring_c.c -o ring_c mpicc -g connectivity_c.c -o connectivity_c gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' shmemcc -g hello_oshmem_c.c -o hello_oshmem gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' shmemcc -g ring_oshmem_c.c -o ring_oshmem gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' shmemfort -g hello_oshmemfh.f90 -o hello_oshmemfh -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No underlying compiler was specified in the wrapper compiler data file (e.g., mpicc-wrapper-data.txt) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- gmake[1]: *** [hello_oshmemfh] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' shmemfort -g ring_oshmemfh.f90 -o ring_oshmemfh -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No underlying compiler was specified in the wrapper compiler data file (e.g., mpicc-wrapper-data.txt) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- gmake[1]: *** [ring_oshmemfh] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-freebsd9-amd64/BLD/examples' gmake: *** [mpi] Error 2 If one looks at the logic in the Makefile, one sees use of shmem_info to determine if the fortran bindings are available. Running that utility manually I see: $ oshmem_info --parsable | grep bindings bindings:c:yes bindings:cxx:no bindings:mpif.h:no bindings:use_mpi:no bindings:use_mpi:size:deprecated-ompi-info-value bindings:use_mpi_f08:no bindings:use_mpi_f08:compliance:The mpi_f08 module was not built bindings:use_mpi_f08:subarrays-supported:no bindings:java:no oshmem:bindings:c:yes oshmem:bindings:fort:yes This already looks suspicious because it reports fortran bindings for oshmem but not for MPI. Well, there is *no* fortran compiler on this system. Quoting from the configure output: *** Fortran compiler checking for gfortran... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for xlf95... no checking for ifort... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgfortran... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for f90... no checking for xlf90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for epcf90... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking whether ln -s works... yes configure: WARNING: *** All Fortran MPI bindings disabled (could not find compiler) So, why "oshmem:bindings:fort:yes"? The AM_CONDITIONAL "OSHMEM_WANT_FORTRAN_BINDINGS" is somehow "true" despite the lack of a fortran compiler. So, I assume something is busted in config/oshmem_configure_options.m4. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900